🔗 Share this article

Turns out he could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.